Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Make (Integromat) vs n8n
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity Agents | Productivity Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium ($10.59) | Freemium (Free (self-hosted)) |
| Rating | | Top Rated |
| Visual scenario builder | β | |
| 1,800+ integrations | β | |
| Data transformation | β | |
| Error handling | β | |
| Conditional logic | β | |
| Scheduler | β | |
| Visual workflow editor | β | |
| AI agent builder | β | |
| 400+ integrations | β | |
| Self-hostable | β | |
| Custom code nodes | β | |
| LangChain integration | β |
Which is better: Make (Integromat) or n8n?
Both are excellent tools β your choice depends on specific needs:
M
Make (Integromat)
Choose Make (Integromat) if you
- Teams who want a visually intuitive automation platform with powerful logic capabilities and extensive integrations
n
n8n
Choose n8n if you
- Summary: 9.0/10 vs 7.9/10
- Self-Host β
- GitHub β 60,000
- Value for Money 10.0
- Features 10.0